The United States or States Rights
The United States is a country composed of 50 states, at least in theory we are a country. When listening to the Right Wing in this “country” a person gets the impression that this isn’t a country with 50 states, but 50 independent countries that allow a central authority to enact laws as long as it doesn’t infringe on the “Will of the State”, or the “Will of the People”. The “Will of the People”; someone needs to explain that the “Will of the People” is shown whenever people vote, or in many cases, don’t vote. It is not whenever some Right Wing orator decides that he or she doesn’t like what the voter’s decided in the last election. If the “Will of the People” is as important as is said why are these minority groups screaming so loud that the “Will of the People is not being listened to? The voters are the Will of the People, not the minority fringe who happen to scream louder than the rest.
These screamers of the “Will of the People” are the same screamers of “States’ Rights”.
The 10th amendment states that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” On the face it seems that the states’ rights advocates are very correct in their belief that the Federal Government should have little power over the states, but this is not 235 years ago when there were only 13 states and those who ran the states were new to the idea of a united country. Today, in a world where weapons can be launched from the other side of the world, and where “multinational” companies control food, medicine, and even the weapons, it is necessary for the survival of the this country that we think as a country first and a state second.
The State’s Rights advocates are very vocal in their beliefs that the state has special rights over the Federal Government. They profess to believe in the Constitution, but how could they when they don’t believe that the Federal Government should have any decision-making control over the states that share this Country.The same people that are professing patriotism are some of the same ones that are threatening to secede from the United States. One very recent example is the Right Wing’s very own Sara Palin. Her husband was one of the leaders of a group that wanted to secede from the United States and until Sara was selected to run for Vice President, she didn’t seem to have any issues with his desire to leave this country. Governor Rick Perry of Texas has been talking about the possibility of Texas seceding from the Union, and calls those who want to leave the United States Patriots. How can someone who wants to breakup this country call themselves patriotic?
These patriots; are they patriotic Americans or are they patriotic Texans, Arizonans, Nevadans, Montanans, etc.? An American patriot believes in this country and would never consider anything as traitorist as seceding from the United States. Those that profess being patriots are traitors to every man and woman who ever fought for this country.
Maybe they are American patriots because their state is in the Americas, not because they care about the United States.
Perhaps their idea of patriotism has to do with how much they agree with the policies of the Central Government of the Confederation of States.We were taught that the Confederacy ended in 1865, but when discussing States’ Rights, the idea of a Confederacy seems the major idea of States’ Rights people, not a true country in the sense of united.
The issue of States’ Rights is extremely old and very much an American tradition, since no other country on this planet has the States’ Rights mentality. Whenever a province of some foreign country cries for their freedom from their country, the United States leads the way to assist that province into becoming “independent”. Perhaps it is time for the 50 states that are supposed to make up this country to become 50 independent countries? That way instead of being a world leader, each one could be a “third world” country with most having a third world economy, with limited financial power as well as limited military power. Obviously some of these new countries would have some military power, depending on the population, such as California, or New York. Others such as Wyoming, Nevada, and Montana could hire mercenaries to protect their borders. Financially, some of the states(new countries) might be able to do well in the global economy, Alaska with their oil fields, Texas with their industry.
Maybe the last 234 years as a country has been a failure and we should just do what the Minority says?
It is a minority that has been calling for States’ Rights. They definitely are a vocal group and they vote, but they do not represent the majority of those of us who believe that we are and should continue to be a Country made up of 50 states, not a confederation of 50 states coming together when it suits them.
They vote and because they vote their power is stronger than their actual numbers. When there is an election a voter turnout of 65% is considered a great turnout. Where are the 35% of the voting population who didn’t vote? If people don’t want the minority controlling the majority, then they better get out and vote. This country should see at least a 90% voter turnout any time there is a national election. If that were to happen, then the vocal minority would go back to their caves where they crawled from and let the United States be the power that it has been, because it is a country, not a confederation of states.
Subscribe by Email














































